DDA?

I've read a lot on this forum about DDA, I don't think it's real. EA wants to keep their players happy so they wouldn't put something so deceitful in the game that would anger their players. Also, the software engineers are just normal people who I'm sure enjoy the game so they would blow the whistle about this. It makes me laugh when I see posts on this forum complaining about any small thing not going their way, you must not watch real football. If you think that you deserve to win every game just because you spend more money than the person you are playing, you forgot about one important thing, skill. So when you spend $100 on the new drop and still can't win with your 97 overall Drew Allar, don't get mad at EA. Hit solo seasons, because you need to learn not to throw into double coverage, or go for it on 4th and 17.

I hate to be the one to break it to you man- these people (the part time ones involved with CUT) do not play their own game I promise you.

Found the EA employee in the forum

Dayres13 said:

Found the EA employee in the forum

I'm just curious as to where people feel DDA affects them most, as there's bs in the game but I notice it in modes other than CUT as well. I think it's easy to just blame the game when things don't go your way. Ik its an arcade game but you see strange things happening in real football (Dalton Kincaid)

rutgersfan1869 said:

I'm just curious as to where people feel DDA affects them most, as there's bs in the game but I notice it in modes other than CUT as well. I think it's easy to just blame the game when things don't go your way. Ik its an arcade game but you see strange things happening in real football (Dalton Kincaid)

I think it mostly stems from the ratings not mattering on cards as much as they should. The most notable one is speed- you'll see speed differentiation that makes zero sense with lower speed players keeping up with/catching/pulling away from higher speed players. Also RR stats getting thrown to the side vs man coverage- goes either way, but no rhyme or reason for it. And spare me the "well fatigue and xyz factor in" because for the most part people that care enough to notice those things notice the "invisible" factors that play into it as well. Whether that's DDA or just stats on cards not mattering at random points throughout the game (sounds like DDA to me), it pretty much just waters everything down. So is DDA a definite sure thing, idk but it's the senseless stat negation (imo) that makes it feel that way.

Its in like every game.... Not just cut, it is 100% in the game though.  The opposite of your logic they don't want new  players or low teams feeling like it's pay to win so they instantly quit.. when facing a low team, your speed is nerfed, your wear and tear is accelerated big time, more inaccurate throws.   So on its about knowing you didn't make a mistake but the game gives you a inaccurate pass on a wide open TD.  While all your guys are exhausted

rutgersfan1869 said:

I'm just curious as to where people feel DDA affects them most, as there's bs in the game but I notice it in modes other than CUT as well. I think it's easy to just blame the game when things don't go your way. Ik its an arcade game but you see strange things happening in real football (Dalton Kincaid)

no i feel you man, its easy to just blame the game and DDA for stuff that happens, but when its stuff you legitimately can not control it gets a little fishy

For example, I play Marshon Lattimore as CB1, with my boosts and strat cards he plays as a 98 in my lineup with 97 speed and 99 man coverage 

I was playing a game where the guy had 92 speed Treadwell in as WR1, game on the line in the 4th quarter, guy has to score or the game is over. I set all my settings, shade over the top, etc. His 92 speed treadwell just randomly torches Lattimore in coverage and has a walk in touchdown. its shit like this that makes us question it. Lattimore had this guy in a straight jacket all game, and you mean to tell me last play of the game Lattimore just decides to not cover him? on a basic go route?

rutgersfan1869 said:

I've read a lot on this forum about DDA, I don't think it's real. EA wants to keep their players happy so they wouldn't put something so deceitful in the game that would anger their players. Also, the software engineers are just normal people who I'm sure enjoy the game so they would blow the whistle about this. It makes me laugh when I see posts on this forum complaining about any small thing not going their way, you must not watch real football. If you think that you deserve to win every game just because you spend more money than the person you are playing, you forgot about one important thing, skill. So when you spend $100 on the new drop and still can't win with your 97 overall Drew Allar, don't get mad at EA. Hit solo seasons, because you need to learn not to throw into double coverage, or go for it on 4th and 17.

yeah sure buddy. Evil Arts will do anything for money. DDA is definitely in the game and it’s completely obvious. they make you lose games so you just buy packs. The only reason why you don’t think it’s real is because you probably get bailed out by DDA in every game you play because you’re bad at the game. type of guy to run double mug on every play and wonder why you get burned. get good then see if you think DDA is real lol

OSBuckeye32 said:

yeah sure buddy. Evil Arts will do anything for money. DDA is definitely in the game and it’s completely obvious. they make you lose games so you just buy packs. The only reason why you don’t think it’s real is because you probably get bailed out by DDA in every game you play because you’re bad at the game. type of guy to run double mug on every play and wonder why you get burned. get good then see if you think DDA is real lol

"Evil arts" listen to yourself. You think the game singles you out and lets other players beat you? A good player can beat a better team, and a good team can beat a better player. EA is much more worried about keeping the spenders spending than getting new players to buy points. I'd definitely take you behind the woodshed with my 92 overall NMS squad. You can keep complaining about how the world is against you but newsflash, you're doing it to yourself. I've played lots of teams with a much worse squad than me, and I hardly ever lose to them. The only time I'm beating people with 95+ overall teams is because they are horrible players, force the ball into coverage and repeat the same plays. And oh yeah, my 94 overall Stutsman doesn't drop easy picks, not because DDA, but because I usually get perfect timing. But keep blaming the game, and keep buying packs.

rutgersfan1869 said:

"Evil arts" listen to yourself. You think the game singles you out and lets other players beat you? A good player can beat a better team, and a good team can beat a better player. EA is much more worried about keeping the spenders spending than getting new players to buy points. I'd definitely take you behind the woodshed with my 92 overall NMS squad. You can keep complaining about how the world is against you but newsflash, you're doing it to yourself. I've played lots of teams with a much worse squad than me, and I hardly ever lose to them. The only time I'm beating people with 95+ overall teams is because they are horrible players, force the ball into coverage and repeat the same plays. And oh yeah, my 94 overall Stutsman doesn't drop easy picks, not because DDA, but because I usually get perfect timing. But keep blaming the game, and keep buying packs.

we found him lol gotta be on EAs payroll , keep defending daddy EA

gobluehailmich1 said:

we found him lol gotta be on EAs payroll , keep defending daddy EA

I find it funny that the people who spend money on the game are the ones who complain the most. It's very sad for them that they can't buy their way out of all-conference in H2H :/

rutgersfan1869 said:

"Evil arts" listen to yourself. You think the game singles you out and lets other players beat you? A good player can beat a better team, and a good team can beat a better player. EA is much more worried about keeping the spenders spending than getting new players to buy points. I'd definitely take you behind the woodshed with my 92 overall NMS squad. You can keep complaining about how the world is against you but newsflash, you're doing it to yourself. I've played lots of teams with a much worse squad than me, and I hardly ever lose to them. The only time I'm beating people with 95+ overall teams is because they are horrible players, force the ball into coverage and repeat the same plays. And oh yeah, my 94 overall Stutsman doesn't drop easy picks, not because DDA, but because I usually get perfect timing. But keep blaming the game, and keep buying packs.

Put your money where your mouth is. You on Xbox? 1v1 there won’t be any DDA to help you out on this one.

Dayres13 said:

Found the EA employee in the forum

Of course it’s the bot name, ea ceo in disguise

It’s obviously in the game I just saw it with my own eyes. Guy I’m playing breaks up the middle with Devin Neal (93 speed). I’m chasing him down with Igbinosun (98 speed, 99 accel with theme team). I actually lose distance on him and he scores a 75 yarder

Meanwhile I’m getting tackled in the backfield trying to run with 96 Etienne or 95 Sampson. It feels like a joke considering the difference in my team vs his. If you’re 2+ overalls better than your opponent you might as well just quit.

Everyone blaming us for having good teams can go play Dynasty. Sorry but when you’re putting money into a game there should be an expectation that your players perform exactly to their stats. Don’t know how this is debatable