CFB.FAN logo
Playbooks
Players
Reveals
Prices
Lineup Builder
Theme Teams
Forums

CFB 26 Ultimate Team
  • Players
  • Reveals
  • Compare Players
  • CUT 25 Players
CFB 26 Playbooks
  • Playbook Database
  • Playbook Finder
  • Search Plays
  • CFB 25 Playbooks
CFB.FAN Resources
  • Abilities
  • Chemistry
  • Theme Teams
  • Lineup Builder
  • Prices Dashboard
  • News
Community
  • Forums
  • Discord
Helpful Links
  • Training Quicksell Values
  • Platinum Quicksell Values
  • Off. Playbook Chemistry
  • Def. Playbook Chemistry
  • Team Strategy Items New
  • Strategy Items New

  1. CFB.FAN
  2. Forums
  3. CFB.FAN Discussion
  4. Ultimate Team
  5. DDA?

DDA?

Last Post
Jkrak
  • Profile
  • Message
Posts: 83
#16
rutgersfan1869 said:

I've read a lot on this forum about DDA, I don't think it's real. EA wants to keep their players happy so they wouldn't put something so deceitful in the game that would anger their players. Also, the software engineers are just normal people who I'm sure enjoy the game so they would blow the whistle about this. It makes me laugh when I see posts on this forum complaining about any small thing not going their way, you must not watch real football. If you think that you deserve to win every game just because you spend more money than the person you are playing, you forgot about one important thing, skill. So when you spend $100 on the new drop and still can't win with your 97 overall Drew Allar, don't get mad at EA. Hit solo seasons, because you need to learn not to throw into double coverage, or go for it on 4th and 17.

What you gonna do with the 25.00 bonus you got for this post?

Last edited by Jkrak - , edited 1 time in total.
Reply with quote Send DM Report
Bustingtomahomes
  • Profile
  • Message
Posts: 160
#17
Jkrak said:

What you gonna do with the 25.00 bonus you got for this post?

lmao

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Jkrak
  • Profile
  • Message
Posts: 83
#18

There is absolutely whithout a doubt game fixing (dda). Anyone who tries to say otherwise is full of shit.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Jkrak
  • Profile
  • Message
Posts: 83
#19
tripleoption said:

Of course it’s the bot name, ea ceo in disguise

Andrew's himself.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Skepple15
  • Profile
  • Message
Posts: 91
#20
WolfOfWelch said:

It’s obviously in the game I just saw it with my own eyes. Guy I’m playing breaks up the middle with Devin Neal (93 speed). I’m chasing him down with Igbinosun (98 speed, 99 accel with theme team). I actually lose distance on him and he scores a 75 yarder

Meanwhile I’m getting tackled in the backfield trying to run with 96 Etienne or 95 Sampson. It feels like a joke considering the difference in my team vs his. If you’re 2+ overalls better than your opponent you might as well just quit.

Everyone blaming us for having good teams can go play Dynasty. Sorry but when you’re putting money into a game there should be an expectation that your players perform exactly to their stats. Don’t know how this is debatable

Abilities matter more than ratings, quick jump on Dlineman is going to mean you're going to get tackled in the backfield a lot...

This is why diamond dynasty will always be better than anything EA puts out, you can see the records of everyone so when the .500 players complain about things helping their opponents it's easy to see why they complain with their records..

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Skepple15
  • Profile
  • Message
Posts: 91
#21
WolfOfWelch said:

It’s obviously in the game I just saw it with my own eyes. Guy I’m playing breaks up the middle with Devin Neal (93 speed). I’m chasing him down with Igbinosun (98 speed, 99 accel with theme team). I actually lose distance on him and he scores a 75 yarder

Meanwhile I’m getting tackled in the backfield trying to run with 96 Etienne or 95 Sampson. It feels like a joke considering the difference in my team vs his. If you’re 2+ overalls better than your opponent you might as well just quit.

Everyone blaming us for having good teams can go play Dynasty. Sorry but when you’re putting money into a game there should be an expectation that your players perform exactly to their stats. Don’t know how this is debatable

Also, stick skills should matter, not how much money you choose to spend...

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Bustingtomahomes
  • Profile
  • Message
Posts: 160
#22
Skepple15 said:

Also, stick skills should matter, not how much money you choose to spend...

What he said has nothing to do with stick skills he just got flat-out beat by someone with 5 less speed than him.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
strategydude
  • Profile
  • Message
Posts: 26
#23
Jkrak said:

There is absolutely whithout a doubt game fixing (dda). Anyone who tries to say otherwise is full of shit.

It's a hallucination by the not-very-bright

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Skepple15
  • Profile
  • Message
Posts: 91
#24
Bustingtomahomes said:

What he said has nothing to do with stick skills he just got flat-out beat by someone with 5 less speed than him.

On what kind of route? a simple go route? ok sure 

Was it a double move with the receiver having cutter? What coverage was he in?

Reply with quote Send DM Report
WolfOfWelch
  • Profile
  • Message
Posts: 25
#25
Skepple15 said:

Also, stick skills should matter, not how much money you choose to spend...

Did you read my post? Stick skills don’t matter when a 98 speed, 99 accel, 94 pursuit player can’t chase down a 93 speed in the open field…

And I get how quick jump works. This guy had no abilities and entirely 90-91 DL while my OL is all 95+.

Regardless, some games are fine and your guys are zooming like they should be with end game speed. Other games, everything drastically changes and your guys run like they’re stuck in mud. It’s extremely noticeable and thousands of people have seen it

Also, EA literally has a patent for DDA and there was a class-action lawsuit brought against them that got dismissed because they couldn’t “prove” it by looking at the game code (that EA can change whenever they want)

Reply with quote Send DM Report
WolfOfWelch
  • Profile
  • Message
Posts: 25
#26

I don’t think money should guarantee you wins. But if EA is gonna advertise “the best players” in packs and get people to drop $$$ on them, the players should actually be the best and outperform much lower overall players in a majority of situations.

In Clash of Clans, you don’t see Supercell boosting lower Townhalls so they can beat up on higher level players to make the game more “fair”.

Play NMS if you want, it’s a choice and I respect it. However, myself and many others did spend money to get the benefits EA advertised. It’s not “fair” to us to give you handouts I’m sorry.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Skepple15
  • Profile
  • Message
Posts: 91
#27
WolfOfWelch said:

I don’t think money should guarantee you wins. But if EA is gonna advertise “the best players” in packs and get people to drop $$$ on them, the players should actually be the best and outperform much lower overall players in a majority of situations.

In Clash of Clans, you don’t see Supercell boosting lower Townhalls so they can beat up on higher level players to make the game more “fair”.

Play NMS if you want, it’s a choice and I respect it. However, myself and many others did spend money to get the benefits EA advertised. It’s not “fair” to us to give you handouts I’m sorry.

Go buy some more points and another pack, that will fix the issue for you.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
strategydude
  • Profile
  • Message
Posts: 26
#28

Everyone who thinks they've lost games because of DDA should be able to report a similar number of games they won because of DDA.

It's mathematically impossible for everyone to be only losing H2H games because of DDA.

In the 9 years I've been on various MUT (and now CUT) forums I've yet to see a single person report they think they won a game because of DDA.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Skepple15
  • Profile
  • Message
Posts: 91
#29
strategydude said:

Everyone who thinks they've lost games because of DDA should be able to report a similar number of games they won because of DDA.

It's mathematically impossible for everyone to be only losing H2H games because of DDA.

In the 9 years I've been on various MUT (and now CUT) forums I've yet to see a single person report they think they won a game because of DDA.

Exactly

Reply with quote Send DM Report
ejstew
  • Profile
  • Message
Posts: 454
#30
strategydude said:

Everyone who thinks they've lost games because of DDA should be able to report a similar number of games they won because of DDA.

It's mathematically impossible for everyone to be only losing H2H games because of DDA.

In the 9 years I've been on various MUT (and now CUT) forums I've yet to see a single person report they think they won a game because of DDA.

bro it's not even about wins and losses, it's literally the fact that at random points the ratings on the cards just do not matter. Yeah- abilities play a factor, but that's not what anyone is talking about lmfao. I'd also be kinda shocked if anyone admitted DDA hasn't gone their way at times, ik it has for me, but it's not as cut and dry as "I won/lost every game due to dda"

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Log in to join the conversation
Prev
1 2 3 4 5 ... 7
Next
© 2025 Stormstrike Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Business Inquiries | MUT.GG | Huddle.gg | FUT.GG