https://cfb.fan/25/lineup-builder/7f79eaa6-821c-44ce-b938-83d82cf93823/
Have about 730k run nickel 95% of the time
https://cfb.fan/25/lineup-builder/7f79eaa6-821c-44ce-b938-83d82cf93823/
Have about 730k run nickel 95% of the time
Solid team. 89 Kight will probably play better than Ersery. WRs are all under 6' so idk if you would want at least one taller guy. Who is your USER? Brooks? MLBs could definitely be quicker at this stage. 89 Dolac and/or Paul or 91 Higgins. I'm assuming the OLBs don't see the field. Probably another top CB is needed. 91 Dennard/Williams if you run zone or 91 McCoy/90 Hunter if you run man.
gphadley9 said:Solid team. 89 Kight will probably play better than Ersery. WRs are all under 6' so idk if you would want at least one taller guy. Who is your USER? Brooks? MLBs could definitely be quicker at this stage. 89 Dolac and/or Paul or 91 Higgins. I'm assuming the OLBs don't see the field. Probably another top CB is needed. 91 Dennard/Williams if you run zone or 91 McCoy/90 Hunter if you run man.
Brooks and Holliman are my users, prolly gonna upgrade LT with the token down the road. I was thinking getting Muhammad for a new cb
Muhammad is a good pick. Do you run more man or zone? Your CBs should definitely be hitting the 90 threshold in the coverage you run the most and 85 in the other coverage with boosts. Having Muhammad, Riley and Hall (better than Garnes maybe Riley) together is contradicting. I also think 89 Johnson is better 89 Wohler. Wohler's zone coverage is just too bad now.