in your opinion is building a max chem team more important then having the best possible player at every spot? seems like when trying to put together a 4-2-5 or a 4-3 team in order to reach 50/50 you have to have afew weak links even with the 25 boost for using the playbook, same on Offense. Ive been debating just adding the team chem and getting the plus 1 speed that way but then even more speed if i could fit a 50/50 chem boost on top of that. Curious to see the lineups. Net worth is just over 2 mil and then also afew 87-89 BNDs as well so i can afford a 87-88 ovr team with no boosts.
d1tizz
Posts: 3
GoIrish1977
Posts: 228
Right now it would be better to have the best players at every position...However in a few months I think the chem teams will be the move.
GiveHim6
Posts: 1
I have teir 10 team chem and the homecoming strat. My team is 89 off, def and ovr but my players are rated higher than that. I think my lowest rated starter is on defense at 87.
https://cfb.fan/25/lineup-builder/dc6b2443-b78b-40c0-bc14-c707d2c758eb/
Last edited by
GiveHim6
- ,
edited 3 times in
total.
mvandor
Posts: 132
It is a balancing act.
I'm at 45/50 Air Raid and 45/50 4-3 Multiple. And 50/50 USC TT.
Had to sacrifice maxing out the chems because too many of my highest cards don't fit but were BND's from BND packs or progress rewards.
ThorAres
Posts: 26
Strat chem can definitely leave you lacking at some positions but its 750k coins for team chem so kind of a toss-up...at this point in year I think its better just to have the best players unless its threshold related
Log in to join the conversation