Schemes and Abilities?

Posts: 58

Just curious what everyone is running

O: Kansas

D: NC State (3-3-5) or Pitt (4-3 multi)

Posts: 92

I'm running stock books.

O: Run and Shoot

D: 4-2-5

I was running 34 for a bit, but my line up was mostly 425 guys so I switched and got to 35/50 which gives +1 PRC, STR, FMV. My best rusher has 95 FMV cause of it and it's noticeable.

The run and shoot scheme comes from growing up watching Hawaii and colt brennan. An I'll say this for all their faults they've really delivered on the PB. It's been fun, authentic to the scheme, and they even updated it with the first big update they did and added missing stuff that is used irl. Really all I got going for this game is I can actually play the RNS scheme with real life knowledge and it works(mostly)....

Posts: 58

kingsanti said:

I'm running stock books.

O: Run and Shoot

D: 4-2-5

I was running 34 for a bit, but my line up was mostly 425 guys so I switched and got to 35/50 which gives +1 PRC, STR, FMV. My best rusher has 95 FMV cause of it and it's noticeable.

The run and shoot scheme comes from growing up watching Hawaii and colt brennan. An I'll say this for all their faults they've really delivered on the PB. It's been fun, authentic to the scheme, and they even updated it with the first big update they did and added missing stuff that is used irl. Really all I got going for this game is I can actually play the RNS scheme with real life knowledge and it works(mostly)....

That's pretty cool you're putting it into practice.

I wanted to stick with 4-3 M because of chem but started messing around with 3-3-5 a few weeks ago and it's just a better fit. The attribute boosts were nice but I've gotten so many more INTs with the new scheme it's a trade off I'm happy to take.

Posts: 92

longocalrissian said:

That's pretty cool you're putting it into practice.

I wanted to stick with 4-3 M because of chem but started messing around with 3-3-5 a few weeks ago and it's just a better fit. The attribute boosts were nice but I've gotten so many more INTs with the new scheme it's a trade off I'm happy to take.

I used 335 tite after 34, but really they were the same just the addition of 335 tite formation, and only the 34 odd. I loved 34 and had some great play but I started having problems stopping the run against better teams, so I figured with the 425 I'll always have 4 rushing unless I need to stop stuff going to the flats. so far I've stuffed some of the best rbs, but now I just run into guys that pass all game and the good ones you have to cause turnovers, simply because they might take a sack here or there but they just stay consistent and keep the chains moving and then you got factor in the lucky jump balls on 4th down and long I always seem to get hit with. in all though the 335 is great just not the best theme attributes for it and some positions are lacking decent players.

Posts: 58

Original post moderated

Why? It's not that serious, dude.

Posts: 58

Original post moderated

It's almost like you have free will to move on with your life and yet just couldn't. Posting is optional.

You seem wonderful.

Posts: 1

O: UVA

D: App State (3-3-5 Tite)

Posts: 44

Washington / 4-3 multiple.

Posts: 12

UNLV / Multiple D

I was a generic Pro truther but I've just gotten a string of BND QBs with bad play action ratings, went from Barnett III to Milroe so I had to shake it up.

Might go to Louisville's once I have a real passer again.

Posts: 58

#10

Ag4te said:

UNLV / Multiple D

I was a generic Pro truther but I've just gotten a string of BND QBs with bad play action ratings, went from Barnett III to Milroe so I had to shake it up.

Might go to Louisville's once I have a real passer again.

I don't really scramble unless necessary so I genuinely had a good time using KJ Jefferson. Decent PA ratings. Only reason I've moved on is I pulled Shapen from a training pack. My favorite QBs so far. I know there are better options and higher rated guys but I prefer their arm action and release over Milroe, Winston, and those guys.

I'm with you though, play action is a part of my game too.

Posts: 149

#11

ive ran Michigan O and Michigan D all year but now i run UAB O and Charlotte D

Last edited by gobluehailmich1 - , edited 1 time in total.

Posts: 58

#12

gobluehailmich1 said:

ive ran Michigan O and Michigan D all year but now i run UAB O and Charlotte D

I've tried both Michigan books too. The offense is cool I just didn't like how the main pass plays were a bunch of crossing routes. I'm not that great, and made my reads slow so I was thinking too much.

I wish I was good enough to keep running the 3-4 because I think mixing up the front seven has real potential but I was just weak on the back end and went back to 3-3-5.

Posts: 4

#13

O: North Texas (Air Raid)

D: 4-2-5

NT's playbook has some gun formations that I like and also has a lot of good option runs. I chose to run Air Raid bc my entire depth of WRs has the chem. There's great budget Air raid QBs like Semonza & Staubach but KJ is the best choice if you have the coins. I currently run Semonza with bronze magician & dot. He also gets +2 Acc +3 Agi from Homecoming + AR chems.

4-2-5 has a formation called Over G that has some amazing blitzes! Lots of good players with the chem too. Currently have Dylan Stewart and Romello Height with bronze quick jump. Super noticeable!