Good offense playbooks for up to three tight ends , 12 or 13 personnel?

Last Post
Posts: 47
#1

Any of the ball experts know which playbooks would be good for 12 or 13 (2 or 3 tight end) personnel?  I have a bogus ban from the auction house so I hang onto my 90+ players (value not worth the quick sell) and now have 3 great tight ends, 4 if you count Kaden Proctor. Only ones I can see are goal line sets and a few sets in Option playbook? Worst case scenario I just sub them in for WRs here and there...thanks guys

Last edited by osucollegebuckeye - , edited 1 time in total.
Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 49
#2

Pro style michigan state

Last edited by Fox87duval - , edited 1 time in total.
Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 49
#3

Iowa also

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 47
#4

Thank you...I'll try them out!!!  More additions to my binder on the playbook front  lol

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 47
#5

Both look great, thank you very much!!!

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 12
#6

Pro style Rice owls

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 47
#7
GatorNation said:

Pro style Rice owls

Thank you, I actually have that playbook but haven't checked it out in a while!!!

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 49
#8

If your gonna run power make sure you get libenentritter fb from nebraska 88 speed w / second level on him . He always clears the strongside backer or any ss out of the way. 89 speed if you run 50/50 pro style . Most of the time it results in me vs user in open field.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 47
#9
Fox87duval said:

If your gonna run power make sure you get libenentritter fb from nebraska 88 speed w / second level on him . He always clears the strongside backer or any ss out of the way. 89 speed if you run 50/50 pro style . Most of the time it results in me vs user in open field.

Great tip Fox, I didn't even think of it from that angle!!!!  I would love it so much if they would put Alstott in this game!!!!

Last edited by osucollegebuckeye - , edited 1 time in total.
Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 3
#10
osucollegebuckeye said:

Thank you...I'll try them out!!!  More additions to my binder on the playbook front  lol

Michigan and Texas as well

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 47
#11
Punsworld said:

Michigan and Texas as well

Yesssss!!!  I do have Texas but I can't do Michigan, I quicksell everything I end up with from Ann Arbor  LOL.  The only student organization I was in at tOSU was the Beat Michigan Week group, although it must be dark times in the student group now  hahahaha

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 47
#12

I'm 50 years old with disposable income, the game is fun and I don't mind spending money.  Don't be jelly  LMAO  Just keep whining about this game it's a bold strategy cotton, let's see how it works out for him (or her  LOL)!!!!

Last edited by osucollegebuckeye - , edited 1 time in total.
Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 21
#13

Ive been loving iowa state for 2-3 te and fullback all on the field

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 29
#14

Iowa state has the best power sets IMO - but Pro Style has some of the better players. I was actually using Memphis + Spread with Proctor and Leibentritt at FB in the Maryland I formation.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 47
#15
CoachSky said:

Iowa state has the best power sets IMO - but Pro Style has some of the better players. I was actually using Memphis + Spread with Proctor and Leibentritt at FB in the Maryland I formation.

I honestly haven't been building my team based on offense chem, been focusing on Team chems.  Would you say playbook chem is more important?

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Log in to join the conversation