and it's been a ton of fun to use. The playbook has a ton of bunch formations and really allows you to come up with multiple ways to attack the field. I tend to stay in a playbook for a long long time after becoming comfortable with it. I'd like to expand the offensive capability and just wanted to see what the community has been enjoying.
miafins97
Posts: 13
Turns2ashes
Posts: 392
I’ve run a few, ran an empty scheme from UNLV, split back shotgun scheme from Vanderbilt, Air Raid from Air Raid and a split close scheme from Tulsa.
I like to buy into an offensive philosophy and build a scheme. Would love to run a wishbone throw back so might give it a go.
Turns2ashes
Posts: 392
Ok update, sticking with my UNLV 5 wide. It’s the most fun I’ve had and counters most blitzes with the fast passing game.
Last edited by
Turns2ashes
- ,
edited 2 times in
total.
Slumping
Posts: 27
Had fun running bowling green. Tons of bunch and trips te. Switched to Texas and am liking the auto motions out of normal y off and tight open
gobluehailmich1
Posts: 599
lol smh
Claysdad
Posts: 367
Turns2ashes said:Ok update, sticking with my UNLV 5 wide. It’s the most fun I’ve had and counters most blitzes with the fast passing game.
I like how various the approaches are. You run 5 wide to counter zero blitzes. I don't run much zero...unless they are empty.
Last edited by
Claysdad
- ,
edited 1
time in total.
Turns2ashes
Posts: 392
Claysdad said:I like how various the approaches are. You run 5 wide to counter zero blitzes. I don't run much zero...unless they are empty.
I find it easy to pick opponents apart form 5 wide. Quick reads before the blitzers can get home.
Turns2ashes
Posts: 392
gobluehailmich1 said:lol smh
Care to expand on that?
lorrdofdarkness0
Posts: 76
Been using Houston lately, I like it I just need more speed on my team fr that’s all
gobluehailmich1
Posts: 599
Original post moderated
yep it wouldnt be so bad if football logic overruled stupidity lol example: if my opp runs dollar i should be able to run heavy sets (i form, strong, etc) and run the ball down their throat. if my opp runs mid blitz i should be able to match the personnel on defense and run gun ace slot off, gun wing tight z etc.. to have 5 o line with 2 TE......THESE COUNTERS SHOULD MATTER, but sadly this game is an absolute shit show. you have to run the META on offense to counter the BS META ON DEFENSE, its disgusting
tripleoption
Posts: 402
Base Option running a Wishbone Tight scheme, lots of fun to use. Absolutely fries mid blitz, loop blitzes, and most of the meta bs in the game.
gobluehailmich1
Posts: 599
tripleoption said:Base Option running a Wishbone Tight scheme, lots of fun to use. Absolutely fries mid blitz, loop blitzes, and most of the meta bs in the game.
ill give it a try.....cant hurt lol
WesleyKirksey
Posts: 1
Anybody running SMU playbook? If so let me know some good plays please
egg1
Posts: 21
Original post moderated
Couldn’t agree more. Every game is against some brain dead garbage-can running the newest YouTube defense paired with their awful offensive spamming of drags and RB dump offs. If it’s not that, then it’s whatever the newest exploit is. They’re the easiest people to play but it gets so boring. With all the different playbooks in the game, you’d think you’d see more scheme based offenses. Anything to get a win I guess.
vucomedy
Posts: 147
I run U Mass mainly because it had several formations and plays I liked from last year’s game and I am comfortable with it.
Use a lot of various formations and mix it up heavily so it is hard to get me pinned down on a particular play.
still labbing with it but winning fair share now
Log in to join the conversation