Tier 10, 50 Components

I have all my players aligned to team chemistry and it stays shows 49/50 components. What might I be missing? 
 

Thank you!

Is anyone playing out of position?

Yeah, I have a couple of folks in different positions cause it give them a higher rating.

on offense, you can nab a k/p with that chemistry I think. Also like mentioned no one can be out of position and you need every position filled including FB (unless you have any SOTS scheme spotlight guys, they can help)

If you have a player out of position, he won't count towards chems. You CAN play someone out of position and have them count, but he ALSO has to be in his actual position. So if you put a TE at FB, he will have to also be in at one of the three TE spots.

Thank you, for the info!

FloorGeneral said:

If you have a player out of position, he won't count towards chems. You CAN play someone out of position and have them count, but he ALSO has to be in his actual position. So if you put a TE at FB, he will have to also be in at one of the three TE spots.

So you can get +2 scheme for this? That is big actually

You don't get +2 chem doing this, no.  They will just benefit from the chem bonuses if you have them in their natural position as a backup, even while starting in another position.   Out of position players don't recieve nor give chem credit.  For team chems, if your team is lucky enough to have rivals cards, they can give +5 team chem.

Jcvols said:

You don't get +2 chem doing this, no.  They will just benefit from the chem bonuses if you have them in their natural position as a backup, even while starting in another position.   Out of position players don't recieve nor give chem credit.  For team chems, if your team is lucky enough to have rivals cards, they can give +5 team chem.

Ah I see.

Power Spread is struggling right now, up until the week 4 scheme spotlight it was the only scheme you couldn't get 50/50 for. There is no K or P, but now there are 2 WR that get x2 so its possible. Still, with 1 good TE and the FB being very low I was hoping this would be a workaround. Thanks for explaining.